|
To a table of contents of section "Joanne Kathleen Rowling
and all-all-all... " |
On main a site |
Russian |
The preliminary remark: This page is
translated from Russian on English by means of
the robot. Therefore all claims on
grammar to it.
"emma watson naked"
or a lesson transfiguration
The Young friend! (and, maybe, and not so young...) Looking through
statistics of visitings of this site, continually I see, that you
quite often get on its pages by inquiry "emma watson naked".
Alas, anything such here is not present.
I represent your
disappointment.
But today you have got here knowingly! Yes,
now you will see "emma
watson
naked", and even in pair with "den
redkliff
naked".
Besides, you will learn to undress and dress
them!
But, "Emma Watson naked" sounds
somehow vulgarly, silly. And here " Emma Watson in Eve's suit " -
absolutely an another matter
So, we come into a Googl, we write in a
search line: " Adam and Eve " also we press a bookmark of "picture".
Cranes, Lukas the Senior (1472 - 1553)
Adam and Eve 1531 State museum (Berlin) |
|
|
| Then we
find in the same way " Emma and Dan's photo ". |
|
 |
| We Open
both pictures in the Photoshop. I have the seventh, but for that, than
we shall be engaged, any will approach.
We see, that
pictures very much differ on the size. In the beginning we shall lead
to their scale similarity. Having made a smaller picture active
(having cluck after it), in the main menu we press "Image" => " Image
Size " and there is here such window |
 |
|
It is visible, that width of a
smaller picture 300, and height of 426 pixels. We remember "300", we
press "Cancel", the window is closed.
Having made active a greater
picture in the same way, we learn, that its sizes 700\945 pixels. We
replace 700 on 300 and the height itself changes on value 405. We
press OK.
I Wish to notice, that in this
picture of the screen palettes and a tool bar are not visible. I have
simply cleaned them for convenience a key "Tab". Secondary pressing
restores them.
Now we direct the cursor at
person Emma and we increase scale of display of a picture: Ctrl+blank+cliques. We click in toolbar the tool "Polygonal Lasso
(L)", establish the
above adjustment "Feather" = 2px (that the contour of allocation was
not too sharp) and we lead
round it the person Emmas. Here so:
|
 |
|
Then we go in "Edit" the main menu
and we copy Emma's head, having pressed "Copy".
We Click now on a small picture,
again we open "Edit" and it is pressed "Paste". Emma's head has
appeared in a new layer atop of Adam and Eve. Again we go in "Edit"
and we press " Free transform ". Around of a head there was a rectangular
with squares on the parties and corners. |
|
 |
|
Directing the cursor on these
squares
and keeping the left key of the mouse, it is possible to change the
size and proportions of the image,> to rotate it and when the cursor
inside of a framework turns to a black arrow, it is possible to move
this image. But for the beginning, at a cursor position inside of a
framework we shall click with the right key, and in the dropped out
menu we shall choose " Flip Horizontal ". A person Emma's will turn in
the direction necessary to us.
But also it not all. A person
Emma's are a little bit more dark Eve's than body, is not that so? We
look, that in a palette "Layers" "Layers") the brush at us stood in a
layer with a person Emma's and is opened " Image => Adjustments => Brightness/Contrast...
". Moving cursors we adjust brightness. If it will seem a little,
there there are still commands " Color Balance... " and "
Hue/Saturation... " by means of which it is possible to adjust the
image on tone.
Whether it seems to you, what
because of Emma's head looks out a part of an another's hairdress?
We Increase scale of display
(Ctrl+blank+cliques) up to 300% (the boomerang effect is reached by
pressing "ALT+blank+cliques"). In a palette
"Layers" ("Layers") it is cluck on a layer with a picture so that the
sign on a brush has moved to this layer - it now active.
We Take in toolbar the tool "
Clone Stamp Tool (S) ". At the upper left we click adjustment "Brush"
and we establish diameter of the tool
3 pixels. In the same place
above there is an
adjustment "Opacity" (Opacity "), set to it value of 100%. Then we
direct the cursor at greens near to a fragment which to us should be
cleaned and it is done "Alt+cliques".
There will be a crossroads of a sight which will
specify to us that place from which we shall start to copy the image,
transferring it on a fragment unnecessary us. Thus we are not afraid
to spoil casually a person
Emma, so it at us in other layer.
And here result: |
|
 |
|
Well, and with Adam,
that is Dan Radcliff, you now will consult!!
It is ready! |
|
Can, and the truth, following film with their participation will refer to " Adam
and Eve in paradise " and then our imagination on the basis of
"Photoshop" will turn to a reality.
Not we are born by gift, that a fairy tale to transform into a
reality!
If something has
not turned out, inform me through the red form which you see below (all
fields are obligatory for filling, it is possible to give no more than 2 message
ssuccessively), I
shall explain more in detail. Come on
other my pages.
Web-master of this site Michael Polsky
|
|
|
|
DISCUSSION
(To read from top to down)
The preliminary remark: This page is
translated from Russian on English by means of
the robot. Therefore all claims on
grammar to it.
|
Yana, the
Goose-crystal
miayana@mail.ru
Hello!
I always protected Dan's name and I can not see, if at it simply
scoff.
It is awful, that you have made with it and Emma. What for? I
understand, what it will add popularity to your site, but unless
it cannot be made other ways? What for it is simple so, for the
sake of entertainment to scoff at Dan. Understand, that it you
spoil the site. You want, that this site became popular? Then
address to me. I know many ways (normal) by means of which it is
possible to raise popularity of a site much more. Look at Dan's
English site (danradcliffe.co.uk). Dan constantly writes there
because workers of a site try to protect it that you have made.
And unless it would want to contact you after has seen that you
with it have made.
Do not think, that I wish to spoil to you opinion on you. I only
wish to help. And all.
Yana.
On August, 17th 2004a. At
21:08 |
|
Webmaster: I Thank you, Yana, for not indifferent
attitude to Dan and Emma and to this theme
in general. You to me remind these Hermione Granger.
Believe, that I love them not less, than you and any insult in
this lesson transfiguration for them I do not see.
Perhaps, still somebody will express as a
matter of fact this question? I place your letter on page which
has caused in you such condemnation and I
wait for responses in the red form above.
18.08.04 00:02 |
|
Anna
I absolutely agree
with Yana. Daniel the good guy, and you vulgarize it. I cite the
reference of its father on danradcliffe.co.uk
"On behalf of my wife
and myself, thank you for the care and attention you take with
danradcliffe.co.uk. We value the responsible attitude you show
towards our son - in particular, in respect to his privacy.
Furthermore, we appreciate the squashing of idle gossip, insane
rumours and wild speculation which abound about his life. His life
is so much simpler than people imagine!"
"On behalf of my wife and it is direct, thank you for care and
attention which you take with danradcliffe.co.uk. We estimate the
responsible attitude which you show to our son - in particular
concerning its privacy. Besides we estimate flattening an idle
gossip, mad hearings and the wild assumption which are available
in a plenty about its life. Its life is so more simple, than
people imagine! "
31.08.04 09:28 |
The Citation:
We estimate flattening an idle gossip,
mad hearings and the wild assumption which are available in a
plenty about its life.
Though it also is
translated, most likely, by the robot, the idea of father Dan is
clear. We shall check up, how much this page corresponds to an
essence of charge. For this purpose we shall not be too lazy to
consult a dictionary
"Dal". " Flattening of an idle gossip " we there,
certainly shall not find:) But there is here such definition:
" A gossip of m.-ieoa. And
spletchik,-?eoa,
spleten,
spletjushnik
psk.
Immodest pereskazchik
or smutnik,
smutchik,
balamut,
a carrier, zaglaznyj
peresudchik.
Any gossip on the head
napletaet. To it do not trust,
he/she is the announced gossip. To gossip, carry gossips. More
than ours it is not gossiped anywhere, do not gossip. Have sat,
have gossiped, and dispatch. "
From here it is visible, that the concept "to gossip" assumes not
which distribution of the information - or false as a matter of
fact, or in subjective negative treatment. What such negative
information is carried in this case? What without clothes it is
similar to Adam? But even it is impossible to consider it the
information, as there is no person in the world which would not
know it.
Besides here there are no " mad hearings ", " wild assumptions ",
etc. about its life. I to be engaged in it did not become
essentially.
Charge from Anna:
" you vulgarize it " .
Let's look at the same "Dal".
" TO VULGARIZE, vulgarize that, to make trite. Not called
pisaki
vulgarize all expressions for deep, sacred feelings, vulgarize
even the words or language. Excessive sweetness of speech
vulgarizes any feeling. - to be
oposhlenu, or to become banal,
become trite or as at us write: trivial, vulgar. "
That is, leaves, having shown Dan in image of Adam, I have
vulgarized it. But in fact Adam is the first person on the ground,
not born, and created by the God, hence, the most perfect from all
people who have vulgarized in the further evolution and struggle
for existence.
Explain to me how can vulgarize someone comparison with
Adam?
(all it, certainly, concerns and to Emma
- Eve)
Yours faithfully
Michael
On August, 31st 2004a. At
14:25 |
- Yana [email]
[Goose-crystal]
Anna, thanks huge for support. I am very glad, that someone has
agreed with me. I too read the letter of its father and
perfectly it I understand. A lot of any awful information write
about it. To take, even that in the childhood it was the ugly
girl. Thanks you for the letter. I am sincere to you is
grateful.
Webmaster, thanks you for expressed opinion. I understand you,
in fact never the opinion happens uniform. But all I shall try
to prove the point of view. Dan and Emma cannot be compared with
Adam
and Eve. Dan itself many times spoke, that with Emma they is
simple FRIENDS. With
Adam and Eve was at all
so. They were not simply friends. In a modern way, the husband
and the wife. So you them have vulgarized all. These are laws of
the Bible which need to be read through more attentively simply.
I very much hope, that you will understand, that it is
impossible to compare that simply it is impossible to compare.
Yours faithfully, your Yana.
05.09.04 20:49 |
| Yana, Adam and Eve were friends the whole
ETERNITY! And only after a case with the snake
and an apple readout of history, time in general because they
became mortal has begun. However, have in exchange got an
opportunity of continuation of a sort as the husband and the wife.
Their life in this not so paradise, and a terrestrial condition -
an instant compared with eternity, that they were simply friends.
Why artists during many centuries come back to the naked Adam and
Eve's theme? Because the mankind to this day aspires to solve a
riddle of occurrence in the world-paradise of a fall of man and
the phenomenon connected with it "death". In fact in the perfect
world created Supreme, any death was not and could not be. And
here, Yana, you are right. You have correctly felt, that a
condition " the husband and the wife "
below that was at Adam and Eve before fall.. But at one great artist you
will not find their image after. After is not so necessarily Adam and Eve, it
already any the man and the woman. But in fact in a picture they it is still
simple friends - During last instant of this
perfect, highest, cleanest condition!
Yours faithfully
Michael
04.10.04 22:12 |
|
|
To a table of contents of section "Joanne Kathleen Rowling
and all-all-all... "
|
|
HERE THERE CAN BE YOUR ADVERTISING
|
|
ON THIS SITE YOU WILL FIND: |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
...and
many other things... |
|
|
